A warranty is a promise that a particular statement made is true at the date of the contract. A breach of warranty gives rise to a claim for breach of contract – the main remedy being an award of damages. A representation, like a warranty, is a statement of fact but is one which is made during contractual negotiations in order to induce another party to enter into a contract.
Join us for a two-hour webinar in which we will take a closer look at these terms and their implications.
This webinar is not currently scheduled.
Dale Hutchison is head of the Internal Research Unit at ENSafrica, and Emeritus Professor of UCT’s department of Private Law. After doctoral studies at Trinity Hall, Cambridge, he returned to UCT as a senior lecturer in Roman Dutch & Private Law. He received a Distinguished Teacher Award in 1982, and in 1983 was appointed to the Chair of Roman Dutch & Private Law. He has also served the Faculty as Deputy Dean; sat as a Commissioner of the Small Claims Court in Wynberg. His main teaching subjects are the Law of Contract and the Law of Cession, but he has also taught many other courses including: the Law of Delict; Succession; Trusts; Estoppel; and Criminal Law. A particular research interest of his has been the problem of economic loss on the border between contract and delict. He has published extensively and was General Editor of Wille's Principles of South African Law. He has practised as an advocate of the High Court.
R695 per person.
How to sign up
Complete and submit the registration form. You will then be given the payment information. Please note that registrations will not be accepted until payment has been made.
One or two days before the webinar, we will send you the Zoom link.
Registrations close three days before the webinar.
View the advert here.
You may also be interested in:
- Contractual clauses – a refresher on some of the more involved contractual terms
- Force majeure clauses in contracts
- Indemnification in contract and its ramifications
- Interpretation of contracts and the parol evidence rule