Animal law in practice: A legitimate way to prevent animal suffering, or a tool to justify, conceal and expand the systemic exploitation of animals?

The institution of law is typically understood as that element of an implied social contract that ensures a just and stable society. More critical views of law argue that it entrenches privilege and moderates dissent, thereby maintaining present social injustices. The legal instruments which purport to protect animals from harm is only one aspect of the body of law we refer to as "animal law". The effectiveness of these protections is a matter of significant dispute and so too are the efficacy and desirability of anti-cruelty statutes. Many advocates for a more just relationship with animals argue that such law frustrates real reform - by creating and maintaining the perception that the use of animals for human ends is not only a social good, but is competently moderated in ways that ensure no ‘unnecessary suffering', 'humane slaughter' and the ‘five freedoms’ for animals.

This webinar will unpack the philosophical issues at the heart of this debate, and identify the way the law works in practice to either protect animals from harm, or to normalise and perpetuate multiple different types of material harm. The discussion will look at some international examples of animal law in practice, before considering this question in a South African context, with a specific focus on the role of the Constitution in framing this debate.

Visit the webinar page.